<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (10) TMI 171 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82157</link>
    <description>Additional evidence in appeal may be admitted only where admissible material was wrongly excluded, was not within the party&#039;s knowledge despite due diligence, or is necessary for proper adjudication or other substantial cause. The two proposed letters were not treated as mere clarification of existing records; they were aimed at challenging comparability of prices used for valuation and at weakening the Department&#039;s evidence. That was viewed as impermissible creation of evidence after proceedings had begun, so the request to admit them was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 12:57:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (10) TMI 171 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82157</link>
      <description>Additional evidence in appeal may be admitted only where admissible material was wrongly excluded, was not within the party&#039;s knowledge despite due diligence, or is necessary for proper adjudication or other substantial cause. The two proposed letters were not treated as mere clarification of existing records; they were aimed at challenging comparability of prices used for valuation and at weakening the Department&#039;s evidence. That was viewed as impermissible creation of evidence after proceedings had begun, so the request to admit them was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>