<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (10) TMI 163 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82149</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the incompleteness of the Collector&#039;s order due to the non-quantification of the duty amount, leading to unnecessary delays. The Tribunal set aside the Collector&#039;s order and remanded the case for a fresh decision, highlighting the importance of a complete order specifying the duty amount confirmed. The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded to the Collector for a de novo decision in line with natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 12:24:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (10) TMI 163 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82149</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the incompleteness of the Collector&#039;s order due to the non-quantification of the duty amount, leading to unnecessary delays. The Tribunal set aside the Collector&#039;s order and remanded the case for a fresh decision, highlighting the importance of a complete order specifying the duty amount confirmed. The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded to the Collector for a de novo decision in line with natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>