<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 214 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82148</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand of Rs. 2,06,479.20 based on evidence of clandestine production and removal of tread rubber. Penalties on M/s. Kushana Rubber Works and the Managing Partner were reduced to Rs. 20,000 and Rs. 5,000, respectively. The validity of the tread rubber production formula was supported, and allegations of clandestine activities were confirmed. Statements by key individuals were deemed credible, with the Tribunal dismissing claims of coercion. Overall, the Tribunal affirmed the duty demand and findings of clandestine activities, with minor adjustments to penalties due to the manufacturer&#039;s small scale.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 12:21:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 214 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82148</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand of Rs. 2,06,479.20 based on evidence of clandestine production and removal of tread rubber. Penalties on M/s. Kushana Rubber Works and the Managing Partner were reduced to Rs. 20,000 and Rs. 5,000, respectively. The validity of the tread rubber production formula was supported, and allegations of clandestine activities were confirmed. Statements by key individuals were deemed credible, with the Tribunal dismissing claims of coercion. Overall, the Tribunal affirmed the duty demand and findings of clandestine activities, with minor adjustments to penalties due to the manufacturer&#039;s small scale.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>