https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82135 A communication from the Superintendent to the Principal Collector was treated as an intimation of approval of the Collector's proposal, not as an adjudicatory order. Because it did not determine rights or liabilities, it was not an appealable order before the Tribunal. On that basis, no appeal lay and the stay application and appeal were not entertainable. en-us Thu, 30 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jul 2011 11:52:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82135 A communication from the Superintendent to the Principal Collector was treated as an intimation of approval of the Collector's proposal, not as an adjudicatory order. Because it did not determine rights or liabilities, it was not an appealable order before the Tribunal. On that basis, no appeal lay and the stay application and appeal were not entertainable. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 30 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82135