<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (3) TMI 223 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82130</link>
    <description>Detergent cakes manufactured on a principal-to-principal job-work basis were not liable to be clubbed with the brand owner&#039;s clearances for small scale exemption purposes because the record showed no related-person relationship, financial control, or flow back of profits. The units were treated as independent, not as a dummy unit of the brand owner, and the earlier Tribunal ruling on a similar factual matrix was applied. The respondents therefore retained eligibility to the exemption and refund claim, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 11:33:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (3) TMI 223 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82130</link>
      <description>Detergent cakes manufactured on a principal-to-principal job-work basis were not liable to be clubbed with the brand owner&#039;s clearances for small scale exemption purposes because the record showed no related-person relationship, financial control, or flow back of profits. The units were treated as independent, not as a dummy unit of the brand owner, and the earlier Tribunal ruling on a similar factual matrix was applied. The respondents therefore retained eligibility to the exemption and refund claim, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>