<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (3) TMI 222 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82129</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the duty demand upheld by the Collector (Appeals) under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962, amounting to Rs. 76,794. The appellants successfully challenged the demand, arguing it lacked legal basis due to procedural irregularities and the absence of proper justification. The Tribunal also ruled against the validity of the Order dated 6-5-1988 issued by the Assistant Collector, finding it beyond jurisdiction and lacking proper basis for the duty amount. Subsequent notices and orders regarding duty demands were reviewed, with the Tribunal ultimately setting aside the impugned Order due to the lack of legal justification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 11:26:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (3) TMI 222 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82129</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the duty demand upheld by the Collector (Appeals) under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962, amounting to Rs. 76,794. The appellants successfully challenged the demand, arguing it lacked legal basis due to procedural irregularities and the absence of proper justification. The Tribunal also ruled against the validity of the Order dated 6-5-1988 issued by the Assistant Collector, finding it beyond jurisdiction and lacking proper basis for the duty amount. Subsequent notices and orders regarding duty demands were reviewed, with the Tribunal ultimately setting aside the impugned Order due to the lack of legal justification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>