<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (3) TMI 221 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82128</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of Infant Incubators under Section 111(m) of the Customs Act, along with an enhanced assessable value. However, the redemption fine and penalty were remitted due to the appellants&#039; production of documents and the critical nature of the goods. The case emphasized the significance of accurate value declaration and consistency in statements, particularly for essential equipment like Infant Incubators.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 11:25:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (3) TMI 221 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82128</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of Infant Incubators under Section 111(m) of the Customs Act, along with an enhanced assessable value. However, the redemption fine and penalty were remitted due to the appellants&#039; production of documents and the critical nature of the goods. The case emphasized the significance of accurate value declaration and consistency in statements, particularly for essential equipment like Infant Incubators.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>