<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (9) TMI 218 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82119</link>
    <description>Foundation bolts used to fasten machinery to a foundation were classified by their actual commercial identity and functional character, not by the fact that they were used captively. Applying common parlance and marketability principles, the goods were treated as bolts because they performed a fastening function and were identifiable as such. The absence of sale did not by itself exclude excise classification where the goods remained marketable and recognisable. On that basis, the goods fell under Item 52 of the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff and not the residuary Item 68, so the Revenue&#039;s classification was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 11:05:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (9) TMI 218 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82119</link>
      <description>Foundation bolts used to fasten machinery to a foundation were classified by their actual commercial identity and functional character, not by the fact that they were used captively. Applying common parlance and marketability principles, the goods were treated as bolts because they performed a fastening function and were identifiable as such. The absence of sale did not by itself exclude excise classification where the goods remained marketable and recognisable. On that basis, the goods fell under Item 52 of the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff and not the residuary Item 68, so the Revenue&#039;s classification was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>