<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (1) TMI 312 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82113</link>
    <description>A departmental appeal is not invalid merely because a copy of the specific authorisation is omitted from the papers served on the respondent, provided the authorisation itself exists and relates to the appeal. Delay in filing may be condoned where the explanation shows sufficient cause, including bona fide internal processing, discussion, preparation of papers, and intervening holidays, and where there is no negligence or avoidable inaction. The operative principle is that sufficiency of cause must be assessed on the facts of each case, and administrative processing time may, in appropriate circumstances, justify condonation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 10:37:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (1) TMI 312 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82113</link>
      <description>A departmental appeal is not invalid merely because a copy of the specific authorisation is omitted from the papers served on the respondent, provided the authorisation itself exists and relates to the appeal. Delay in filing may be condoned where the explanation shows sufficient cause, including bona fide internal processing, discussion, preparation of papers, and intervening holidays, and where there is no negligence or avoidable inaction. The operative principle is that sufficiency of cause must be assessed on the facts of each case, and administrative processing time may, in appropriate circumstances, justify condonation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>