<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (6) TMI 189 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82110</link>
    <description>Customs valuation may reject declared invoice value where the importer does not substantiate claimed differences in freight, quality, or contract timing, and where contemporaneous prices of similar goods at the time and place of importation are available. The record showed no evidence of the freight difference between containerised and non-containerised imports, and no material distinction was established between FAQ quality and whole variety goods. On that basis, adoption of contemporaneous import prices in preference to the invoice value was justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 10:30:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (6) TMI 189 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82110</link>
      <description>Customs valuation may reject declared invoice value where the importer does not substantiate claimed differences in freight, quality, or contract timing, and where contemporaneous prices of similar goods at the time and place of importation are available. The record showed no evidence of the freight difference between containerised and non-containerised imports, and no material distinction was established between FAQ quality and whole variety goods. On that basis, adoption of contemporaneous import prices in preference to the invoice value was justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>