https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82094 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that approved prices under Part II for sales in Hyderabad and Bombay were valid. The decision emphasized the importance of genuine pricing for goods sold through depots and consignee agents, following the precedent set in a previous case. The Tribunal found no suppression of facts, thus disallowing the invocation of a longer period of limitation. en-us Fri, 16 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Jul 2011 18:28:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82094 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that approved prices under Part II for sales in Hyderabad and Bombay were valid. The decision emphasized the importance of genuine pricing for goods sold through depots and consignee agents, following the precedent set in a previous case. The Tribunal found no suppression of facts, thus disallowing the invocation of a longer period of limitation. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 16 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82094