https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82088 An application seeking variation of an interim stay order is distinct from rectification of mistake and may be heard by the Bench seized of the matter; a challenge to the President's administrative direction must be pursued separately. The Tribunal also held that variation of a deposit condition requires a sufficient change in circumstances. As the later balance sheet showed current assets substantially exceeding current liabilities, no adequate basis was shown to alter the earlier stay order requiring part-deposit of the duty demand. The stay condition was therefore maintained, with the appeal remaining subject to compliance and further orders on possible dismissal for non-compliance. en-us Fri, 09 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Jul 2011 18:02:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82088 An application seeking variation of an interim stay order is distinct from rectification of mistake and may be heard by the Bench seized of the matter; a challenge to the President's administrative direction must be pursued separately. The Tribunal also held that variation of a deposit condition requires a sufficient change in circumstances. As the later balance sheet showed current assets substantially exceeding current liabilities, no adequate basis was shown to alter the earlier stay order requiring part-deposit of the duty demand. The stay condition was therefore maintained, with the appeal remaining subject to compliance and further orders on possible dismissal for non-compliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 09 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82088