<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (10) TMI 148 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82087</link>
    <description>The appeal was rejected, affirming the classification of Fork Lift Truck Tyres under Heading 4011.91 for the purpose of levying Additional Duty (CVD). The Tribunal upheld the authorities&#039; classification, emphasizing that Fork Lift Trucks possess attributes of vehicles designed for off-road use, aligning with the revenue-raising objective of the Central Excise Act. The Miscellaneous Application for additional evidence was disposed of without a separate order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 18:00:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (10) TMI 148 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82087</link>
      <description>The appeal was rejected, affirming the classification of Fork Lift Truck Tyres under Heading 4011.91 for the purpose of levying Additional Duty (CVD). The Tribunal upheld the authorities&#039; classification, emphasizing that Fork Lift Trucks possess attributes of vehicles designed for off-road use, aligning with the revenue-raising objective of the Central Excise Act. The Miscellaneous Application for additional evidence was disposed of without a separate order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>