<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 203 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82082</link>
    <description>The appeals and stay applications were adjourned and directed to be listed after the Larger Bench decision, with no coercive recovery to be taken while the stay applications remained pending. The operative effect was that recovery action was deferred until the Larger Bench ruling was available and the stay matters were considered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 17:51:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 203 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82082</link>
      <description>The appeals and stay applications were adjourned and directed to be listed after the Larger Bench decision, with no coercive recovery to be taken while the stay applications remained pending. The operative effect was that recovery action was deferred until the Larger Bench ruling was available and the stay matters were considered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>