<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 198 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82077</link>
    <description>Excise-duty refund claims must comply with the six-month limitation under Section 11B, and departmental authorities cannot grant relief beyond that period on the ground of a mistake of law. Rule 173-I cannot bypass the prescribed refund procedure where the RT-12 assessment does not disclose an excess duty payment available for adjustment as credit. The refund claim was rejected as time-barred because it was filed after the statutory period, and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 17:39:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 198 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82077</link>
      <description>Excise-duty refund claims must comply with the six-month limitation under Section 11B, and departmental authorities cannot grant relief beyond that period on the ground of a mistake of law. Rule 173-I cannot bypass the prescribed refund procedure where the RT-12 assessment does not disclose an excess duty payment available for adjustment as credit. The refund claim was rejected as time-barred because it was filed after the statutory period, and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>