<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 189 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82068</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal in a case concerning the classification of Tannic Acid B.P. 1973 under the Customs Tariff. The appellants&#039; claim for exemption under Notifications 77/86-Cus. and 31/88-C.E. was rejected as the goods were classified as a reagent in the British Pharmacopoeia, indicating they were not suitable for medicinal use. The Tribunal concluded that Tannic Acid did not qualify as a pharmaceutical chemical or bulk drug, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 17:03:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 189 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82068</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal in a case concerning the classification of Tannic Acid B.P. 1973 under the Customs Tariff. The appellants&#039; claim for exemption under Notifications 77/86-Cus. and 31/88-C.E. was rejected as the goods were classified as a reagent in the British Pharmacopoeia, indicating they were not suitable for medicinal use. The Tribunal concluded that Tannic Acid did not qualify as a pharmaceutical chemical or bulk drug, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>