<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (7) TMI 198 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82022</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, setting aside the Collector of Customs (Appeals) Bombay&#039;s Order dated 11-10-1988. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, stating that duty should only be charged on the material used in the fabric, which in this case was yarn, and not on the fibre content.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 13:52:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (7) TMI 198 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82022</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, setting aside the Collector of Customs (Appeals) Bombay&#039;s Order dated 11-10-1988. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, stating that duty should only be charged on the material used in the fabric, which in this case was yarn, and not on the fibre content.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=82022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>