<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 234 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81999</link>
    <description>Cloves imported under the April 1990-March 1993 Import and Export Policy fell within the specific spice entry in Paragraph 167 of Chapter XIII, which expressly included cloves as items importable only against licence. Because the policy contained a specific provision for cloves, the general residual entry for drugs and drug intermediates in Item 169 of Part I of List 8, Appendix 6, could not be applied. The classification was also consistent with common parlance and trade understanding, under which cloves are treated as a spice rather than a drug or drug intermediate. Import without the required specific licence was therefore not permissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 234 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81999</link>
      <description>Cloves imported under the April 1990-March 1993 Import and Export Policy fell within the specific spice entry in Paragraph 167 of Chapter XIII, which expressly included cloves as items importable only against licence. Because the policy contained a specific provision for cloves, the general residual entry for drugs and drug intermediates in Item 169 of Part I of List 8, Appendix 6, could not be applied. The classification was also consistent with common parlance and trade understanding, under which cloves are treated as a spice rather than a drug or drug intermediate. Import without the required specific licence was therefore not permissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>