<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (12) TMI 254 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81973</link>
    <description>Time was extended for the petitioners to file replies to multiple show-cause notices concerning alleged shortlanding, and the respondents were required to examine those replies and issue speaking orders. The Bombay High Court granted six months for filing the replies, ensuring the petitioners had an extended opportunity to respond before any final decision, and directed the respondents to decide the replies by reasoned orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:35:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (12) TMI 254 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81973</link>
      <description>Time was extended for the petitioners to file replies to multiple show-cause notices concerning alleged shortlanding, and the respondents were required to examine those replies and issue speaking orders. The Bombay High Court granted six months for filing the replies, ensuring the petitioners had an extended opportunity to respond before any final decision, and directed the respondents to decide the replies by reasoned orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>