<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (7) TMI 185 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81952</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a customs duty dispute regarding the date of removal of goods from a bonded warehouse. It held that the actual delivery date by the Warehouse-keeper to the importer should determine the duty rate, not the date in the warehouse register. The Tribunal differentiated between goods delivered before and after the duty rate increase, applying the relevant duty rates accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:42:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (7) TMI 185 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81952</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a customs duty dispute regarding the date of removal of goods from a bonded warehouse. It held that the actual delivery date by the Warehouse-keeper to the importer should determine the duty rate, not the date in the warehouse register. The Tribunal differentiated between goods delivered before and after the duty rate increase, applying the relevant duty rates accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>