<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (7) TMI 183 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81950</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the Collector&#039;s order, ruling that the engineering fees paid to Siemens AG should not be included in the assessable value of the imported goods. The Tribunal found that the fees were for overall design and layout of the plant, not specifically for the imported equipment, thus not falling under Rule 9(1)(b)(iv) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:38:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (7) TMI 183 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81950</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the Collector&#039;s order, ruling that the engineering fees paid to Siemens AG should not be included in the assessable value of the imported goods. The Tribunal found that the fees were for overall design and layout of the plant, not specifically for the imported equipment, thus not falling under Rule 9(1)(b)(iv) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>