<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (7) TMI 175 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81942</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Collector&#039;s order, as the appellants were not barred from challenging the valuation. The decision stressed the need to assess value based on actual selling prices in international trade, rejecting reliance on telex offers without evidence of corresponding imports.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:15:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (7) TMI 175 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81942</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Collector&#039;s order, as the appellants were not barred from challenging the valuation. The decision stressed the need to assess value based on actual selling prices in international trade, rejecting reliance on telex offers without evidence of corresponding imports.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>