https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81940 The Tribunal allowed the applicants to move an application if any coercive process is initiated, deferring interim orders due to larger considerations. The Tribunal found the unilateral debit by the Range Superintendent during the pendency of the Stay Application to be arbitrary and ordered the respondents to reverse the debit entry and report compliance by a specified date. The Tribunal directed the respondents to reverse the debit made in the RG-23A Part II Account, emphasizing the importance of the matter and highlighting its decision to reverse the arbitrary debit entry. en-us Wed, 22 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:09:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81940 The Tribunal allowed the applicants to move an application if any coercive process is initiated, deferring interim orders due to larger considerations. The Tribunal found the unilateral debit by the Range Superintendent during the pendency of the Stay Application to be arbitrary and ordered the respondents to reverse the debit entry and report compliance by a specified date. The Tribunal directed the respondents to reverse the debit made in the RG-23A Part II Account, emphasizing the importance of the matter and highlighting its decision to reverse the arbitrary debit entry. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 22 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81940