<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (7) TMI 165 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81932</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the demand for duty and penalties imposed by the Collector. It found that the Department failed to prove that the appellants were evading duty by operating as a single unit. Additionally, the Tribunal noted the lack of a specific finding on the classification issue of Gharghanti under the Central Excise Tariff.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:39:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (7) TMI 165 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81932</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the demand for duty and penalties imposed by the Collector. It found that the Department failed to prove that the appellants were evading duty by operating as a single unit. Additionally, the Tribunal noted the lack of a specific finding on the classification issue of Gharghanti under the Central Excise Tariff.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>