<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (7) TMI 155 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81922</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order confirming demands by the Collector of Central Excise, Kanpur, due to improper confirmation and violation of natural justice principles. The order passed beyond the directed four-month period was deemed valid but lacking compliance. Denial of inspection of records/documents was found unjustified, requiring the Collector to provide full access. The absence of a personal hearing constituted a violation of natural justice. The case was remanded for inspection of all relevant documents, filing objections, a personal hearing, and a thorough consideration of defenses, emphasizing cooperation from the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:17:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (7) TMI 155 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81922</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order confirming demands by the Collector of Central Excise, Kanpur, due to improper confirmation and violation of natural justice principles. The order passed beyond the directed four-month period was deemed valid but lacking compliance. Denial of inspection of records/documents was found unjustified, requiring the Collector to provide full access. The absence of a personal hearing constituted a violation of natural justice. The case was remanded for inspection of all relevant documents, filing objections, a personal hearing, and a thorough consideration of defenses, emphasizing cooperation from the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>