https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81921 Revenue recovery during pendency of a stay application was treated as unjustified where the appellants had already deposited the amounts under Section 35F and no prior show cause notice had been issued. Because the dues had been paid, the stay application was held to have become infructuous and was dismissed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal also recorded the appellant's request and the Revenue's lack of objection, and directed an out-of-turn hearing of the appeal in the interest of justice on 25-8-1992. en-us Mon, 06 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:14:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81921 Revenue recovery during pendency of a stay application was treated as unjustified where the appellants had already deposited the amounts under Section 35F and no prior show cause notice had been issued. Because the dues had been paid, the stay application was held to have become infructuous and was dismissed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal also recorded the appellant's request and the Revenue's lack of objection, and directed an out-of-turn hearing of the appeal in the interest of justice on 25-8-1992. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 06 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81921