<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (7) TMI 153 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81920</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Department&#039;s appeal in a case involving a dispute over the quantity of imported Pig Iron. The discrepancy between the declared quantity and actual weighment, reliability of the Draft Survey method, and admissibility of additional evidence from the Port Trust were key issues. The Tribunal set aside the Collector&#039;s order and determined duty assessment based on the actual weighment of 5476.500 MT, supporting the Department&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:12:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (7) TMI 153 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81920</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Department&#039;s appeal in a case involving a dispute over the quantity of imported Pig Iron. The discrepancy between the declared quantity and actual weighment, reliability of the Draft Survey method, and admissibility of additional evidence from the Port Trust were key issues. The Tribunal set aside the Collector&#039;s order and determined duty assessment based on the actual weighment of 5476.500 MT, supporting the Department&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>