<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (7) TMI 151 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81917</link>
    <description>A composite reading of the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff treated the soap entry as covering household and laundry soap only, with toilet soaps falling in the residuary category. Legislative history, including deletion of a separate toilet soap entry, supported that construction, and the appellants&#039; own long-standing classification under the residuary item reinforced it. Affidavits and common parlance evidence were insufficient because they showed household use for personal hygiene, not trade recognition as household soap. Contemporanea expositio and the cited exemption notification did not alter the tariff meaning. The result was that toilet soaps were classifiable under Item 15(2), not Item 15(1).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:06:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (7) TMI 151 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81917</link>
      <description>A composite reading of the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff treated the soap entry as covering household and laundry soap only, with toilet soaps falling in the residuary category. Legislative history, including deletion of a separate toilet soap entry, supported that construction, and the appellants&#039; own long-standing classification under the residuary item reinforced it. Affidavits and common parlance evidence were insufficient because they showed household use for personal hygiene, not trade recognition as household soap. Contemporanea expositio and the cited exemption notification did not alter the tariff meaning. The result was that toilet soaps were classifiable under Item 15(2), not Item 15(1).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>