<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (5) TMI 121 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81893</link>
    <description>Penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was held unsustainable where Modvat credit was entered in RG-23A Part-I before physical receipt of goods, but the goods and duty-paying documents were received shortly thereafter and there was no misuse of credit. The record showed substantive compliance with the Modvat scheme, and the breach was treated as merely technical. Applying the principle that penalty is not warranted for a venial breach without deliberate defiance of law, the penalty was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:57:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (5) TMI 121 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81893</link>
      <description>Penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was held unsustainable where Modvat credit was entered in RG-23A Part-I before physical receipt of goods, but the goods and duty-paying documents were received shortly thereafter and there was no misuse of credit. The record showed substantive compliance with the Modvat scheme, and the breach was treated as merely technical. Applying the principle that penalty is not warranted for a venial breach without deliberate defiance of law, the penalty was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>