<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (5) TMI 114 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81880</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Board exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 129D(1) by directing the Collector to file an appeal based on issues not part of the original proceedings. The appeal was deemed ab initio beyond jurisdiction and was rejected. The cross-objection by the respondents was allowed, affirming that the Board cannot travel beyond the record of the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:10:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (5) TMI 114 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81880</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Board exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 129D(1) by directing the Collector to file an appeal based on issues not part of the original proceedings. The appeal was deemed ab initio beyond jurisdiction and was rejected. The cross-objection by the respondents was allowed, affirming that the Board cannot travel beyond the record of the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>