<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (5) TMI 108 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81872</link>
    <description>An imported car&#039;s assessable value for customs was examined against the TELCO price list, with the Tribunal applying an earlier similar ruling that had allowed a 15% trade discount for an imported Mercedes Benz car. Because the lower authorities had also used the TELCO price list for valuation, the same valuation approach was followed. The 15% discount was allowed on the TELCO price list, and the appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:54:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=119017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (5) TMI 108 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81872</link>
      <description>An imported car&#039;s assessable value for customs was examined against the TELCO price list, with the Tribunal applying an earlier similar ruling that had allowed a 15% trade discount for an imported Mercedes Benz car. Because the lower authorities had also used the TELCO price list for valuation, the same valuation approach was followed. The 15% discount was allowed on the TELCO price list, and the appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>