https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81870 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of following the guidelines set by the Collector (Appeals) and limiting the adjudication to the scope of the remand order. The lower authorities were criticized for not adhering to the Collector (Appeals) guidelines, and the adjudicating authority was found to have erred by exceeding the remand order's scope. The Tribunal clarified that the Collector (Appeals) order was clear and specific in its scope, and any deviation was unwarranted. en-us Fri, 15 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:52:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81870 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of following the guidelines set by the Collector (Appeals) and limiting the adjudication to the scope of the remand order. The lower authorities were criticized for not adhering to the Collector (Appeals) guidelines, and the adjudicating authority was found to have erred by exceeding the remand order's scope. The Tribunal clarified that the Collector (Appeals) order was clear and specific in its scope, and any deviation was unwarranted. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 15 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81870