<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 226 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81815</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against duty demand on manufacturing and clearing tread rubber clandestinely, finding the lower authority&#039;s order lacking a proper basis for determining production solely based on electricity consumption. Emphasizing the need for a reliable production norm, the Tribunal criticized the lower authority&#039;s reliance on fluctuating electricity consumption and production figures without considering other factors like raw material consumption. It directed a fresh adjudication, suggesting test-run production to establish a credible norm and consultation with rubber technologists to determine acceptable criteria for production calculation. The appeal was remanded for a new decision based on these considerations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:52:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 226 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81815</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against duty demand on manufacturing and clearing tread rubber clandestinely, finding the lower authority&#039;s order lacking a proper basis for determining production solely based on electricity consumption. Emphasizing the need for a reliable production norm, the Tribunal criticized the lower authority&#039;s reliance on fluctuating electricity consumption and production figures without considering other factors like raw material consumption. It directed a fresh adjudication, suggesting test-run production to establish a credible norm and consultation with rubber technologists to determine acceptable criteria for production calculation. The appeal was remanded for a new decision based on these considerations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>