<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 225 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81814</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of a government notification exempting hot rolled stainless steel coils exceeding 500 mm width for cold rolling, rejecting a challenge claiming discrimination under Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The court found the notification specific to a category of goods and not discriminatory, allowing all meeting conditions to benefit. Despite deficiencies in respondent materials, the court presumed the notification&#039;s constitutionality, emphasizing the government&#039;s conscious decision not to amend it. The court dismissed the writ petition, directing the judgment to the Ministry of Finance to address defense lapses and prevent future issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:47:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 225 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81814</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of a government notification exempting hot rolled stainless steel coils exceeding 500 mm width for cold rolling, rejecting a challenge claiming discrimination under Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The court found the notification specific to a category of goods and not discriminatory, allowing all meeting conditions to benefit. Despite deficiencies in respondent materials, the court presumed the notification&#039;s constitutionality, emphasizing the government&#039;s conscious decision not to amend it. The court dismissed the writ petition, directing the judgment to the Ministry of Finance to address defense lapses and prevent future issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>