<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 213 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81773</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision directing the Assistant Collector to pay the balance amount claimed by the respondents with interest at 12% per annum from the date of the impugned order. The Assistant Collector sanctioned the refund with interest as per the High Court&#039;s order. The Collector (Appeals) correctly interpreted the High Court&#039;s direction that interest should be calculated from the date of the impugned orders, leading to the dismissal of the appeal challenging the Collector (Appeals) order. The Assistant Collector was directed to make a fresh decision within two months and refund the amount accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:27:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 213 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81773</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision directing the Assistant Collector to pay the balance amount claimed by the respondents with interest at 12% per annum from the date of the impugned order. The Assistant Collector sanctioned the refund with interest as per the High Court&#039;s order. The Collector (Appeals) correctly interpreted the High Court&#039;s direction that interest should be calculated from the date of the impugned orders, leading to the dismissal of the appeal challenging the Collector (Appeals) order. The Assistant Collector was directed to make a fresh decision within two months and refund the amount accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>