<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (1) TMI 222 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81758</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi, ruled in favor of the appellants in a dispute over the classification of imported goods under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The goods, described as dampening rollers made of textile material for offset printing machines, were incorrectly assessed under Heading 59.01/15 as textile hose pipings. The tribunal agreed with the appellants that the items should be classified under Heading 59.16/17 as textile articles commonly used in machinery or plant. By considering the function and nature of the goods, the tribunal concluded that the correct classification was essential, emphasizing the importance of accurately interpreting goods for proper tariff classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:45:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (1) TMI 222 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81758</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi, ruled in favor of the appellants in a dispute over the classification of imported goods under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The goods, described as dampening rollers made of textile material for offset printing machines, were incorrectly assessed under Heading 59.01/15 as textile hose pipings. The tribunal agreed with the appellants that the items should be classified under Heading 59.16/17 as textile articles commonly used in machinery or plant. By considering the function and nature of the goods, the tribunal concluded that the correct classification was essential, emphasizing the importance of accurately interpreting goods for proper tariff classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>