<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (1) TMI 218 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81754</link>
    <description>Grooved rubber sheets emerging after the dump mill stage were treated as plates, sheets or strips under Item 16A(2) because the manufacturer&#039;s own flow chart and sample description showed the product as a sheet, and the broad tariff meaning covered grooved sheets. The goods were also held to be unhardened rubber, as the chemical examiner&#039;s report described them as flexible and containing insufficient sulphur to establish hard rubber. A fiscal exemption for vulcanised rubber products, non-curing, for tyres was construed according to its ordinary meaning, so pre-cured tread rubber used in retreading tyres qualified because no further curing was required for the tread itself. The exemption claim therefore succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:37:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (1) TMI 218 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81754</link>
      <description>Grooved rubber sheets emerging after the dump mill stage were treated as plates, sheets or strips under Item 16A(2) because the manufacturer&#039;s own flow chart and sample description showed the product as a sheet, and the broad tariff meaning covered grooved sheets. The goods were also held to be unhardened rubber, as the chemical examiner&#039;s report described them as flexible and containing insufficient sulphur to establish hard rubber. A fiscal exemption for vulcanised rubber products, non-curing, for tyres was construed according to its ordinary meaning, so pre-cured tread rubber used in retreading tyres qualified because no further curing was required for the tread itself. The exemption claim therefore succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>