<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (11) TMI 150 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81743</link>
    <description>Receipt of the impugned order was accepted as satisfactorily explained, so the appeal was treated as filed within time. As the appeal was thus within limitation, no condonation of delay was required, and the condonation application was dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:51:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (11) TMI 150 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81743</link>
      <description>Receipt of the impugned order was accepted as satisfactorily explained, so the appeal was treated as filed within time. As the appeal was thus within limitation, no condonation of delay was required, and the condonation application was dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>