<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (1) TMI 245 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81717</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that rubber blankets imported for textile printing did not qualify for the concessional rate under Notification No. 169/77-Cus. The Collector (Appeals) was found to have erred in interpreting the term &quot;printing industry&quot; to include textile printing. The Tribunal reinstated the Assistant Collector&#039;s decision, allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and denying the benefit claimed by the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:54:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (1) TMI 245 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81717</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that rubber blankets imported for textile printing did not qualify for the concessional rate under Notification No. 169/77-Cus. The Collector (Appeals) was found to have erred in interpreting the term &quot;printing industry&quot; to include textile printing. The Tribunal reinstated the Assistant Collector&#039;s decision, allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and denying the benefit claimed by the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>