<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 205 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81690</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s application for a stay on the Collector (Appeals) order granting a refund to the respondents. The Collector (Appeals) decision allowing the refund was upheld based on compliance with refund claim requirements and a Tribunal decision. The Revenue&#039;s argument that the appellants were ineligible for a refund under Section 11C(2) due to duty incidence passed to consumers was not found persuasive. The Tribunal acknowledged the need for a detailed examination but found no prima facie error in the Collector&#039;s order, indicating the Revenue&#039;s potential to recover duty if the final decision favored them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:21:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 205 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81690</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s application for a stay on the Collector (Appeals) order granting a refund to the respondents. The Collector (Appeals) decision allowing the refund was upheld based on compliance with refund claim requirements and a Tribunal decision. The Revenue&#039;s argument that the appellants were ineligible for a refund under Section 11C(2) due to duty incidence passed to consumers was not found persuasive. The Tribunal acknowledged the need for a detailed examination but found no prima facie error in the Collector&#039;s order, indicating the Revenue&#039;s potential to recover duty if the final decision favored them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>