https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81681 A later notice to prosecute must remain confined to the offences authorised by the earlier judicial direction and cannot be expanded to include additional offences. On that basis, the Bombay HC restricted the prosecution notice to the offences under Sections 193, 209, 210 and 468 read with 471 of the Indian Penal Code, while recognising that the alleged conduct involved serious forgery-related wrongdoing. The Court also held that a separate contempt proceeding was unnecessary where criminal prosecution was already being set in motion, and it discharged the contempt notice. en-us Fri, 24 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:42:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81681 A later notice to prosecute must remain confined to the offences authorised by the earlier judicial direction and cannot be expanded to include additional offences. On that basis, the Bombay HC restricted the prosecution notice to the offences under Sections 193, 209, 210 and 468 read with 471 of the Indian Penal Code, while recognising that the alleged conduct involved serious forgery-related wrongdoing. The Court also held that a separate contempt proceeding was unnecessary where criminal prosecution was already being set in motion, and it discharged the contempt notice. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 24 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81681