https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81679 The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application seeking rectification of a mistake in dismissing their appeal for non-deposit by the Regional Bench instead of the Special Bench. The Tribunal found no jurisdictional error in the Regional Bench's dismissal and emphasized the necessity of complying with deposit requirements. It stated that even if there was an error, rectifying it by committing another error was not justified. The application for rectification based on jurisdictional error was deemed misconceived and rejected by the Tribunal, upholding the dismissal of the appeal under Sec. 129E of the Customs Act, 1962. en-us Fri, 07 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:39:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81679 The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application seeking rectification of a mistake in dismissing their appeal for non-deposit by the Regional Bench instead of the Special Bench. The Tribunal found no jurisdictional error in the Regional Bench's dismissal and emphasized the necessity of complying with deposit requirements. It stated that even if there was an error, rectifying it by committing another error was not justified. The application for rectification based on jurisdictional error was deemed misconceived and rejected by the Tribunal, upholding the dismissal of the appeal under Sec. 129E of the Customs Act, 1962. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 07 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81679