<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 194 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81678</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35F was considered appropriate because the export goods were in Customs custody, having been detained and confiscated, and were not under the Central Excise Department&#039;s control. Since the export bond remained alive, immediate recovery was treated as unwarranted, and discretion could be exercised to extend time on conditions. The relief was granted, with recovery stayed during the appeal on terms that the export bond be kept in force or a fresh bond furnished if expired.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:38:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 194 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81678</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35F was considered appropriate because the export goods were in Customs custody, having been detained and confiscated, and were not under the Central Excise Department&#039;s control. Since the export bond remained alive, immediate recovery was treated as unwarranted, and discretion could be exercised to extend time on conditions. The relief was granted, with recovery stayed during the appeal on terms that the export bond be kept in force or a fresh bond furnished if expired.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>