<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 192 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81676</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for a fresh consideration, emphasizing the need for a fair assessment of the ownership, origin, and liability of the confiscated video cassette tapes. The decision highlighted procedural lapses and the lack of conclusive evidence regarding the foreign origin of the goods, leading to the order for a de novo examination in compliance with legal standards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:31:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 192 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81676</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for a fresh consideration, emphasizing the need for a fair assessment of the ownership, origin, and liability of the confiscated video cassette tapes. The decision highlighted procedural lapses and the lack of conclusive evidence regarding the foreign origin of the goods, leading to the order for a de novo examination in compliance with legal standards.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>