<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (1) TMI 212 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81671</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, BOMBAY ruled in favor of the applicants, directing them to provide a bond covering the duty amount and deposit a specified sum within a timeframe to avoid appeal rejection. The tribunal found the absence of evidence supporting power usage in fabric processing during the period under scrutiny. Despite financial instability, the appellants were granted relief upon compliance, ensuring duty coverage and safeguarding their production operations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:17:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (1) TMI 212 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81671</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, BOMBAY ruled in favor of the applicants, directing them to provide a bond covering the duty amount and deposit a specified sum within a timeframe to avoid appeal rejection. The tribunal found the absence of evidence supporting power usage in fabric processing during the period under scrutiny. Despite financial instability, the appellants were granted relief upon compliance, ensuring duty coverage and safeguarding their production operations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>