https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81668 The Tribunal rejected the supplementary appeals' delay condonation, upheld the denial of concessional duty rate for parts of electric measuring instruments, and affirmed the statutory duty rate under Heading No. 90.16(1) as applicable, based on the Bombay High Court's interpretation in a relevant case. The appeals were dismissed as the headings for the goods were not covered by the exemption notification, indicating the government's intent not to extend the exemption benefit to those specific goods. en-us Fri, 03 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:00:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81668 The Tribunal rejected the supplementary appeals' delay condonation, upheld the denial of concessional duty rate for parts of electric measuring instruments, and affirmed the statutory duty rate under Heading No. 90.16(1) as applicable, based on the Bombay High Court's interpretation in a relevant case. The appeals were dismissed as the headings for the goods were not covered by the exemption notification, indicating the government's intent not to extend the exemption benefit to those specific goods. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 03 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81668