https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81658 The Tribunal's appellate jurisdiction was held not to be displaced by the pendency of reference proceedings, and its power to grant stay was treated as incidental and ancillary to that jurisdiction. Relying on an earlier decision on similar facts and the Supreme Court's approach, it considered that a stay already granted in the appeal could properly be maintained while the reference was pending. The existing stay was therefore extended and continued in force until disposal of the reference matter. en-us Tue, 08 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:41:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81658 The Tribunal's appellate jurisdiction was held not to be displaced by the pendency of reference proceedings, and its power to grant stay was treated as incidental and ancillary to that jurisdiction. Relying on an earlier decision on similar facts and the Supreme Court's approach, it considered that a stay already granted in the appeal could properly be maintained while the reference was pending. The existing stay was therefore extended and continued in force until disposal of the reference matter. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 08 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81658