<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (6) TMI 159 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81636</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, except for the modified fine and penalty. The judge reduced the fine to Rs. 3,000 and the penalty to Rs. 500, considering the appellant&#039;s background and the minor nature of the breach. The appellant was entitled to a refund of excess payments. The decision balanced statutory compliance with leniency based on the specific circumstances and nature of the offense.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:13:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (6) TMI 159 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81636</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, except for the modified fine and penalty. The judge reduced the fine to Rs. 3,000 and the penalty to Rs. 500, considering the appellant&#039;s background and the minor nature of the breach. The appellant was entitled to a refund of excess payments. The decision balanced statutory compliance with leniency based on the specific circumstances and nature of the offense.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>