https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81612 Out of turn hearing was sought on the basis that similar appeals had already been fixed for hearing, and the Revenue raised no objection because the issue appeared covered by earlier Tribunal decisions. In the interest of justice, the Tribunal exercised discretion and allowed the matters to be listed on 10-3-1992. It further held that the Supreme Court direction requiring PSU matters to be heard by a Committee constituted by the Cabinet Secretary would not apply where a regular judicial order had been passed and the appeal arose under a statutory right, so the Tribunal could hear those appeals. The miscellaneous applications were allowed. en-us Thu, 19 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:10:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81612 Out of turn hearing was sought on the basis that similar appeals had already been fixed for hearing, and the Revenue raised no objection because the issue appeared covered by earlier Tribunal decisions. In the interest of justice, the Tribunal exercised discretion and allowed the matters to be listed on 10-3-1992. It further held that the Supreme Court direction requiring PSU matters to be heard by a Committee constituted by the Cabinet Secretary would not apply where a regular judicial order had been passed and the appeal arose under a statutory right, so the Tribunal could hear those appeals. The miscellaneous applications were allowed. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 19 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81612