<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (3) TMI 163 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81602</link>
    <description>Promissory estoppel may bind the State where a governmental promise is made and relied upon to the promisee&#039;s detriment, but it cannot compel performance of a promise that conflicts with constitutional limits, a taxing statute, or public policy. The text distinguishes a permissible tax exemption granted as an industrial incentive from a promise to refund sales tax already lawfully collected. A refund of lawfully realised tax would divert public revenue to a private party and is inconsistent with the constitutional scheme of taxation, so such an assurance cannot be validated by equity and would be void as against public policy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 20:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=118747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (3) TMI 163 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81602</link>
      <description>Promissory estoppel may bind the State where a governmental promise is made and relied upon to the promisee&#039;s detriment, but it cannot compel performance of a promise that conflicts with constitutional limits, a taxing statute, or public policy. The text distinguishes a permissible tax exemption granted as an industrial incentive from a promise to refund sales tax already lawfully collected. A refund of lawfully realised tax would divert public revenue to a private party and is inconsistent with the constitutional scheme of taxation, so such an assurance cannot be validated by equity and would be void as against public policy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=81602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>